Paging Control
previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous next next next next next next next nextThe Message Column
Have they learned nothing despite the constant trumpet blare of 'Equality. Equalidad. Equality'? It's not just men who behave like creeps. It's not just straight men. Any one can get that way if the people around them don't call them out and make them adhere to a better way to interact. It can be anyone: male, female, straight, gay, unknown. Anyone is capible of being a self-entitled creep who things they are above reproach. It's not just men. It's not just some special class of men. It's all people.
some people use sex as a weapon! It can be any gender, any orientation, any ethnicity. The age of sexual blackmail should be over. but it doesn't seem to be.
There are those who use sexual blackmail in politics. These new revelations ought to change that behavior. Consent and 'do not tell' agreements contribute to the problem: it grants a false sense of imunity. Look how Harvy got away with it, until his indecent behavior made it an over whelming priority that his behavior become widely known.
I think that people make mistakes. If their behavior changes, they can be more easily forgiven.
Also, the kind of person who does the creep and power-mongering behavior isn't limited by gender or 'orientation'. So when I hear the talking heads on NPR saying it's 'men' in Washington, I say, well, men in the sense of gender-inspecfic old-school use of the world 'men' to men all mankind.
People get addicted to a narraitive. When that is a false one we tend to find that some people get upset when we don't accept it any more. We let them get away with their imprecise descriptions of other people's behavior, and now what they go-on-about has devolved into a kind of slander against a whole class of people: powerful 'men' in Washingon or Holywood, or Manhattan, or in the Tech Industry.
Those who habitually used sexual blackmail to get their political agenda passed now have one less tool to use. Why? Because the consent decree to 'keep silent' just should not be allowed to fly anymore.
don't live in a fairy land and not understand that sexual blackmail has been an important method that has been utilized to have various 'agenda's become top priority.
Did we get to a place where the only people in power are those who can easily be blackmailed? Isn't this a kind of slavery? Don't we want to be free of it?
It's easy to take sides: liberal/conservative, but the fact is the better side is to be on the non-creep side. That is the side that says people have rights and that they ought not be coerced into prostitution to maintain their livlihood. So I've said it: it is those who coerce others into prostituting themselves for their career. In the case of politics some might argue that anyone in it has been coerced in some way, and is thus 'controlible' through blackmail, sexual or otherwise.
That leaves the door open for those who want to vend their touch. And it leaves protection for those who want their career to be free of forced prostitution. And in Hollywood and in Washington, Manhattan, London, etc etc, we have a lot of powerful mongering people who want even more, ever more, power and influence and are not beyond sacrificing their pretty young things to get some sway in the important chambers. If we deny this we learn nothing from this current scandal.
If we prohibit the buying of silence through this kind of court sanctioned censorship we thus limit the power of the sexual blackmailers.
An old proverb:
Those who say do not know. Those who know do not say.
Well, what did you think I'd say?
Just a little bit, a little bit at a time, Lord.
this image selector div is for the page body background
this image selector div is for the column background
Oh tiny font nonsense, just because your letters are smaller doesn't mean you have some alternative importance.
Praise Praise Praise
the the the
Lord Lord Lord!
for because
Easter He's so awesome!
welcome to The Message Column!
🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑 ♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥
Is it obvious parody or News or both?
🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑 ♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥
Vote Once One Vote here is a fresh link, a new path to some older content:
Just a little bit, a little bit at a time, Lord.
Kafka was a dillhole, Orwell was a submissive? depends on who you ask. . .
So what did just happen?
There has been a very lot of very important very very this week and I could let you know what I've heard myself but, it isn't anything. I'd just be repeating what you can find on your own. I have no insight or new knowledge, but a lot of questions.
If I started putting out my conjecture about what has just 'gone done' and why, I'd me just fanning the flames of conflation of simultanious events as being related, or reveeling, by just making a good guess, someones close to the mark explanation about how and why and who and who's doing it and when will it end, etc.
I ran into someone who I didn't know who wanted to show me a photo of him in Vegas with a famous Rock Star (who I love) and it was cool. and I was like 'way cool. But then I asked him 'how it was' in Las Vegas since the beginining of last month. Were people still upset? He said not that he saw. So what can I conclude from that ? Business as usual? I'm asking questions and no one can answer them so why?
One of the euphemisms that is being used to describe the mass-arrests in Suadi is that there is a 'corruption probe' going on. Another was that it is a 'counter coup'.
Two 'princes' died in unexpected suddenness, one in an heliocoptor crash, the other in a fire fight with his body guards defending him. So the government by consensus is over? Or did the situation warrent this for reasons that won't be put forward for 75 years because the nature of it is too sensative?
And our State Department is on board with the on-going 'corruption probe' in Saudi. There are many other dots in this constilation that we could connect. I't all over the news who is connected to who, who was puppetting who. And as we know the things that come from one place that are lauded are often copied elsewherre. We know that Saudi didn't invent the purge, but they sure have given us all food for speculation.
But what do I know? Nothing. If there are executions I'd prefer there also be trials. In the world of kings and international regime mongering, and funding of foreign operations, know this: they don't just go and target anyone for no reason. There is always a reason that these things happen. And it's never just arbitrary and it's not without a lot of forethought. So we can make up something. And most of us will. It will trouble us. We'll glom around The Net looking for frozen insight, something dated from before, when we didn't know, someone who might have been eyes open and wide and sucking in the stream of what is actually ahppening.
The narrative of 'corruption probe' is . . . lacking. People will write a Hamlet. to fill in the blanks. They'll cast politicians as failed Lady McBeth's. She'll be bubbling in toil and troubling (very troubling)
Ya, so explanations are scant. And now Twitter has upped the number of characters that they allow. Wow. So if it's dumb before, with twice as many characters is it twice as dumb?
Ya, if I don't know why am I going on with this?
Nov. 9, 2017
delight in the delete.
Remember the Sultana!
April 27, 1865
© 2016 © 2017 ©
Praise Praise Praise
the the the
Lord Lord Lord
for his for his for his
unfailing unfailing unfailing
love! love! love!
well, little else now.
Paging Control
previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous next next next next next next next nextCopyright 2005 - 2012, 2013, 2014 © 2015 © 2016 2017 ©©. Amillia Publishing Company.All rights reserved.