The Message Column

False Persona Postings

Doesn't it sometimes seem we are under a constant propaganda war which is evident when reading the spam and chat-bot commentings that are put into every effective news site's comments, probably from the ? ? ? who is doing it? ? ? We hear it is paid for through . . . or it comes from ? ? ?

if you can stand to glance at the putrid comments, you notice that the kinds of arguments, or the 'jist' of what is often presented doesn't seem to come from an authentic person. The ideas are often very old-world as if it's from an American, when clearly the person has written some tripe, based upon their own fallacies about Americans, and presented a troll-person as if this is real, when we kjnow that real people , in America, don't think like that. We have never had to worry about things in that way, and we don't have any of the hangups that the false personage of the post has.

So we know that such postings are fraudulent.

But often there are other posts which are not. And the really fraudulent ones always seem to show up where the mensch posts might be. So the false persona postings of imaginary 'racist white people', who are parodies of American's based upon? ? ? I want to conjecture that it might be from propaganda postings of the Cold War era (which cold war? there are so many of them by now.)

False persona postings don't have to be obviously fraudulent. I am sure that if someone knows vague things about another place, they can craft an effective fraud.

The snarking angel demands that I snark: " Don't most people seem to do that in their day to day goings on and on about it?"

Shut up snarking angel and find yourself a good teacher!

But he makes you funny. (?) maybe not, but make you seem a little bit jaded if you go with him and repeat his kind of humor

Snarking angel at it again: how do you know to use 'he'?

In any case, the fraud is real, but so are the authentic insights. And thus we still frequent the comments. It would be good if the fraud could be filtered out. But doesn't that open up another big can of worms.

Well, what did you think I'd say?

Just a little bit,
a little bit at a time, Lord.

sending people home

You can say that you'd sent all the 'illegals' home. But if that happens to be in Framingham, are you OK with it if that's where they all go, or where ever that is? If you don't know people, you don't see them around, you don't have any idea that they are someone who might be willing to take your help if you could aid them, but being polite and self sufficient they never ask and you don't offer until you do. or they do. And it's all good. If you see them, you don't have to be so-called 'polite', because the standard of behavior is only real in the minds of the crowd. So you don't know, specifically, what makes them joyous in their human encounters. How can you light their fire and make their mountainside shine in the brilliance of the awareness of the presence of . . . in all things, in the face of a stranger you see that face for but a flash moving in different trains, each racing in different directions. The congruence of human expectation that crosses all boundaries. Not what is it about them that makes them bad and horrible, you are bad and horrible for looking for that in them. And you don't do it, by habit, except when you are tired or without nourishment, or otherwise compromised and in a 'low' state of mind, when you need rest and retreat and sleep and comfort and food (my prayer for you or how you really are?).

The congruence of what we agree about, that's the thing to find in the quest for meaning when relating to other 'groups' who we perceive around us. So don't see the 'illegal', see the person. If you say that they all should go home, and they've made their home here? Is it OK with you if they go home here, in the town that is nearby?

Is it OK with you if they go home here?

Does anyone care about where someone else comes from as long as that other person isn't causeing problems in the new neighborhood? The cartel ways of colonizers is to be seen as a possible excuse for the way that some go on with stupid rhetoric of sending them all 'home'. I say send them to where they are useful and safe. And if only useful for themselves or their own families. I say if that is in Framingham or if it's in Sao Paulo, if someone, a non criminal, has been here working for ten years, what sane person would 'send them back'? Yes, let them go home. To Ashland, or Wayland, or Concord, or Lexington, where ever they can live, where ever they do live. And if there were to be a 'deportation', I'm sure it would be very unpopular if it were to happen to just anyone and not to known problem citizens. Cartel people who go on with the damaging cartel ways, and the constant spreading of bad addiction, which is killing people, those cartel people are the ones that sane border policy says 'we ought to have this option'.

and then the constant fear of the old world mindset, routed here in the new world by now: they fear a purge, they fear internment, they don't trust the . . . who is it that they don't trust?

hover above images for a modification effect.

hover modifies the back ground for the page.

this image selector div is for the page body background

hover modifies the back ground for the column.

this image selector div is for the column background

Oh tiny font nonsense,
just because your letters are smaller
doesn't mean you have some alternative importance.

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord!
  for    because    
 Easter  He's so awesome! 
  welcome to The Message Column!

      🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
      ♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

Is it obvious parody or News or both?

 

hover above images for a modification effect.

🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

     
Vote Once
One Vote
here is a fresh link, a new path to some older content:
   
   
 

 
 Just a little bit,
a little bit at a time, Lord.
 

In Wicked Need of an Edit

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

Political and Media Inanity

Kafka was a dillhole, Orwell was a submissive? depends on who you ask. . .

Truck-u-later

in this column Truck-u-later steps in deeper . . .

Sept. 1, 2017

delight in the delete.

Remember the Sultana!

April 27, 1865

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord
  for his    for his    for his
 unfailing  unfailing  unfailing
   love!      love!      love!



  well, little else now.