The Message Column

Police

Are Necessary

Police are necessary and awesome. Police and those who keep order when truculence reigns, are hallmark of an advanced society. Local enforcers who only know the local scene, people who live in the neighborhood, are part of the commnity, those who serve: they are part of why we were not haulled off as slaves in the long ago to serve the lie and to serve the liars and whatever falseness that they present to justify their indifference to the equality of all, and their delusion of their own supremacy: it was because we had people watching and willing to act that we didn't get hauled away as slaves. That is how it is. In the real world. A description of how I see it, and I think that you can agree that we are not correctly here, as a society, without some kind of protection. And it is always local.

The protection 'society', or 'racket' if it gets mean or surley, is always local. And anything beyond that is an agreement between friends. And so you can't just have people showing up and saying 'oh, ya, we are in charge here now'. That is what a Federal or INternational Police would be. But that isn't police. that is a military, an occupying force. We all know that. Call it what you want, but the rulers of the slave societies always want to elliminate the local police before they go and and do their havoc. Back in the day they would haul people off. Now, in a city, they just convert them to the way of the street, a needle in the arm, addict them, and then, well, they become willing in their crimes. It doesn't have to be that way. And it is a sad vestage of the fuedal. The way that the world really works with the 'this for that' street trade and very many addicted to either sex, or drugs, or both, and with serious damaged things from their past that haunt them, like indifference and disrespect from those who are supposed to love them. And if that gets very degenerate for the people, and if the place is unfit for children, and yet children are there and not being cared for, the welfare portion being used to feed the works, the gummy works. And the children might have to raise themselves.

What can the cops do? They can find it, maybe by accident, and have the children 'brought in', the parents or guardians hauled before a judge, the department of social services, they will get involved. That is America. What happens elsewhere? I can only imagine, if I say it will be fiction.

In the case of what happened last night we all know that in the end the Police always win, the rule of law always wins, when it's a city, when it's a very large crowd. Society, everyone, doesn't let mayhem of child-minded operatives, hypnotized with theories of hate and ready to aim and shoot an innocent person, who is just doing a job, it was calculated, this hateful ness, with a political purpose. The 'movement' is a fully funded political entity of the left. But that is a red herring.

The local always wins. The local police always win. The union of local people, local police, the chambers of commerace, all of that, wins. And when it doesn't we get slum and we have danger. And talking about racism there is a lot of BS, becuase in such a place it is dangerous for everyone and it has nothing to do about race. Those who pander to some kind of credo of the gettho, as if it's a racial thing, everyone knows that is a tired schtick, when in the lawless zone. Black, White, or whatever. When you are in a place where rule of law is whatever someone mean and willing and hurtful says, when the beat down is the primary method of enforcment, and enforcers and officers are targetted, and where anyone who is there to enforce codes is treated as a villain: when it gets like that and lawlessness is there there either is a local group who deal with keeping the peace (some call this a mafia, others a fraternal order). This is a fact. Either that or we have the case of people being brutalized and harmed and done to harm. And when the tyranny that lets such go on, after peace is established and the bad-actors (the criminals) are elliminated in whatever fashion the populace of mature and capible enforcing adults deems prudent (and outside of courts and so-called departments of justice, which only exist to support corportist or local concerns). The police are a necessary part. And if a place or province or subset of people become lawless, there always arrises someone with in who is the regent of that place, or some loose council of people. And the people around them are a kind-of police, and get the respect of police (they are mafia police, respectful but different in that they don't cowtow to the bs of laws that only benefit the powerful.

Once again: my main point: enforcers, though a regretible cultural phenomenea, are necessary. And to manifest this as a union of local people all over the country, the Brotherhood of the Police, or to manifest it as the solans of local control (when police aren't effective justice on that population) Police, or Police like people do and always exist and when they don't we can have mayhem except that the rule of non-centralized living (when people no longer heed the corrupt governace of the pig-at-the-trough self-servers: very many career politicians and their ilk, and their enablers. When that all looses the respect of the people that older form of justice comes back, and those solans are also enforcers but they don't care about your stinkin' badges. We all get this. The President gets this. That is why the people want their guns because they fear that the rule of pre-Police, like it is in very many places, will expand into their spheres. And so someone wants to start a war, of sorts, against the lawless enforcers of some ??? who exactly??? want to start a war against the legal enforcers (the local Dallas Police).

The deal is: here is the deal: the guy with a high-power and scope system, perched on a ledge overlook like a hawk, and trained in marksmenship who does this kind of crime is also of the Police-class. They are trained in this, and they are the enforcer types, even if they aren't of the Police, or of a local drug or prostitution mafia, or enforcers for off-book loan operations, or other such enforcer class, the marksmen who were there in Dallas are people, that if they were sane, would want to be part of the local Police. They would want to be part of it, becase that is what their training is. Those people, in the Dallas police, in one sense (but not morally, because those marksmen last night were criminal creeps and they will be served with nightmares and worse). Rejected candidates for someone's security team? An organization, of some kind, dedicated to the same business as the police, but not with the same obvious and socially just creed or to protect and to serve.

If this is insurrection, and some retrograde group as decided to start killing our heroes on their own streets, and while protected the local protestors, if that is really where we are it is necessary to have the people around who support the Brotherhood of Police and expand it as well to include the loose fraternity of enforcers: all of those who will take sanctioned action to do what is necessary to stop creeps for killing innocents. Those police, last night, were innocents.

Honest and honorable people, even if they are alledged to be within a criminal entity, support justice and rule of law, and understand that enforcers, police and security crews, are a necessary part of any civil society.

If any one argues the otherside, and presents that they believe some kind of cruel and random justice was administered by this other force of enforcers (a retrograde militia against the legal police) If anyone apologizes for these murders, and doesn't see the shooters as criminals, they you might reconsider their mental state. If you should be associating with someone in the throws of delusion? Maybe it's a crazy uncle. There are always people addled who will say what it is that they think will be the most scandalous. But if they were really there and they had a guy in their scope what would they do then?

The quality of someone, anyone, who would do this kind of thing is retrograde, their morality non existent. To kill in cold blood for no reason other than politics or insurrection: criminals. Criminals and that is why we need police. Local police. Who are trusted by the locals. And trusted and loved by the other enforcers (they are all inthe same game of keeping the people safe from the creeps).

It wasn't the gun, it wasn't the bullets. The same hate would exist even if neither of those did. The ones who would assassinate an officer of the law would do other horror with whatever they coudl get their hands on. So stop with the gun-grab foolishness.

Here is reality: we will always have enforcers who make people follow the rules. In a more advanced culture we set up police departments. And in an even more advanced one we have them all working together so that the Boston Police talk to the Sommerville Police, etc. And also, beyond that we have State Police. All of these have jurisdiction. In the so-called criminal world we also have enforcers. WE have private security who work various venues and locations. They all are in loose union, not all friends, but not enemies necessarily. What we had last night seems to be an organized effort of some kind of retrograde enforcers, trained in various techniques, and utilizing it against those who they feel are enemies for the purposes of ? ? ?

Who and why. Those are the questions. Meanwhile try to be a little bit kinder. Cops are not enemies, though they do need to be bad-asses. And put on a good and tough front for the public.

Respect. It's all about respect. And love. Love of others. We want what is good, we don't want creeps gaining sway.

Oh, I know, the whole theory of 'bad' cop or 'corrupted' police force. It does happen. Were any of those officers targetted because someone knew them and hated them specifically? That is possible. Just a way to murder someone and blame randomness. Let's hope it all gets investigated.

There will always be enforcers, in any civilized place, that are empowered to uphold the law. We can organize them into Police, or we can just have them be strong-arms for the local kingpins: a security crew. They are always there. They will always be there. And when they are gone that is when we have problems and things can devolve because when peole don't face consquences for bad behavior it only gives them license to do even worse things. When laws that matter are not enforced, then the lawless devolve into even more decadent lawlessness.

Supporting police doesn't mean cowtowing to them. What does it mean? Follow the directions of a person on duty without giving them any kind of bad thoughts or ill will. This will be a tough time for officers of the law. And we all need to be sensitive to their emotional well being. I am a little bit of a ra-ra cop guy, and I admit that it might seem a little bit sychopantic, a fetish perhaps. I don't act that way to an officer when he is in my face with my bad behavior. I am not saying to be submissive. I am saying to be fair, honest, respectful, and dutiful when dealing with the legal and moral requests of law enforcers when they are on the job. They are there to help you to proceed safely so look at it like that: they are being paid by you to make sure things are OK and that no one gets hurt. On the job: at work, in constant danger from creepy discontented partisans.

Showing them love doesn't mean sychopancy. Nor does it mean that you have to overly friendly. In fact that would be distracting. When dealing with officers on duty you have to let them do their jobs and not try to engage them in distractions. It depends.

Be human, and loving, which means sometimes that you engage them in as terse as necessary, but as polite as possible.

What I like to do, if I sense a tense situation, is that I will be there walking through, and I'll stumble upon a scene where there are officers on duty. For whatever reason. They are there. ON the street. 'important people' are inside, maybe the president, and the officers are there. I have the hat that I wear when I am out photographing. It is a distinct and idiosyncratic thing, usually. I wear it to tell the world: here is excentric photo-takers prancing through. that is what I do, I prance through wiht my expensive lens and take hundres of shots of ordinary things. If there is some stuff going on, and a reason for security, and I have my hat on, I'll take it off to show my full face, I'll uncover and let them get a good look at me. I'll show them that all I have is a camera. And if they tell me that I can't be there? They are on duty. I'm just day tripping through some city (usually Boston). I'm not there to take compromising pictures.

As another act of respect, I don't post images of the dark suited burly men who surround giants of politics, such as Senator Kennedy. It, to me, seemed to be a security breech. I don't 'take' their picture. If they happen to be there, they might end up in a photo or two, especially if I take a sequence of them. But on my website I don't show these guys if you can tell who they are, or up close, I don't. I also don't take pictures of strangers. That would be a closeup of them where they are the subject. If it's a group of kids in a fountain, and I'm off a block away, and I can get them all dancing and it's an awesome group of pictures, I'll take that, and who ever is there. But I don't close up on people I don't know, I don't treat them as subjects, and I do not do papparazzi stocking. I have some famous people who I have managed to capture in my lens when they were in a public place and doing the obvious greet for fans and papparazzi (like outside of the Ed Sullivan Theatre and they will also sigh autographs from the door to the door of the limo).

Respect. Respect and love that isn't displayed as sycophancy. And a burning urge to make sure that everyone gets home safely. That is the dream.

It's a sad day. I babble on. I know that justice will prevail.

Cry baby, Cry baby,
where did you go?
Of into wild drift
of blizzarding snow?

hover above images for a modification effect.

PULSE

hover modifies the back ground for the page.

this image selector div is for the page body background

hover modifies the back ground for the column.

this image selector div is for the column background

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord!
  for    because    
 Easter  He's so awesome! 
  welcome to The Message Column!

      🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
      ♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

  When you're
  crazy lonly
  no one reads
  your mind
  you find
  the highway stop
  too cold 
  must move on
  to home
  some dream
  outside
  of time
  greenlawn heart growing
  stronger
  give up the fear
  
  
 
 

hover above images for a modification effect.

🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

changing it now.

     oh those arbitrary frames!
      spinning, but not this line.
     
spin me a yarn neon
spin me a yarn neon
spin me every where but not here!
here is a fresh link, a new path to some older content:
   photo pile!
   
 

boobo
boo
ba
bamm

she brings it.
She brings it.

ringdemnify

Tranformational bubble tech,
with a nano-fullerine 
hybirdized rubber. 
The amazing hover boo,
hover boy, 
hover bour wheels
are all future tech,
and it's here now,
so get on board.

In Wicked Need of an Edit

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

Political and Media Inanity

Kafka wrote comedy. Orwell was a pessimist. Depends who you ask.

Truck-u-later

in this column Truck-u-later steps in deeper . . .

July 2, 2016

Billion dollar ideas? They are all around us!

Alright. We'll be changing it up a little bit!.

Cal:

"I never minded the surveillance society. I've always been kind of an exhibitionist"

June 6, 2016

"I never minded the surveillance society. I've always been kind of an exhibitionist."

 a beat . . .

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord
  for his    for his    for his
 unfailing  unfailing  unfailing
   love!      love!      love!

  well, nothing more here today.