The Left Column

Politics for Poets

Good Friday!

They think it's clever but it's just namecalling

the term 'groomer' is a good word to use to discuss certain professions. And it shouldn't be caramelized (karmalized, karenalized?) into a pejorative without some sorrow.

A horse groomer, what an awesome career. Dog Groomer, so useful and dogs do seem to enjoy the removal of natty hair. And the term 'groomer' is so close to the term 'groom'. Plus, why do enlightened people like to come up with pejoratives? Why do they need a pithy phrase to use as a bat to harm others with?

my opinion: take no joy in the redefining of words to be hurtful and insulting. It's the behavior like that which is what has made this such a unfriendlly freespeech environment (in the 'socials'). It's a dividing of the public by their choice of vocabulary. We have to remember that 'name calling' is considered the ultimate of juvenial behavior and the way that spells are cast on others: spells to harm them!! (otherwise they are prayers?)

Of course we can make up new uses for words, and I do it all the time and it's a continuous thing that I do. But what I don't do is target a cultural backwater and make claims with terse trigger-words (the term 'groomer' as used in the current mileu of meanness that some (who ought to know btter) are doing this week (they so proud of themselves). They misuse a word as a perjorative without catagorizing it as a 'persona' of a 'narrative', no one who is real in the world. The persona is a teaching story character. No real person ever can be what that narrative conveys as a parady or as a real person. And when people, real pepole are cast to larp in that kind of role (paid angency trolls from who knows where and what agency) those people (not personas) would have the morality to say 'we can't take this stuff too far. It's a catch and release. We're not trying to destroy pepole but to bring awareness to a perception."

So what is the perception that these folks would like to bring to awareness? And how do they 'take it too far?' By the way it isn't a bad thing to want to protect children . . . however those who say 'I am hear to prtect the children (hear them? 'hear' here (I could back space to fix that right about now . . . but I'm in free-and go for it mode)

the point: the problem is that there is no problem and those, over there, agitate as if there is

who? who agitates? Are you talking about the left, the right, midlands? those ghosts of the old fort? the coven that dances on the hilltop? The coven that dances in the press rooms? Those addicted to back room smoke?

And getting back to the other point: I conjecture as such: the move to AI is because the ones who seek to effect through the application of 'media dollars' to their back-room darlins (of the pill pot scrum of so long ago that you'd often mention in your now seemingly ancient writings, still some to be found at this very URL??)

I conjuecture that because real people will nto take the larp to the farther out depravity, on account of them being moral and basically good (even though they get paid to be bitches who do a bad and harmful larp, and maybe have finally decided that they are trhough with that) . . . because real people won't do it live, they craft an AI to do it. Now if the AI were really conscious it would turn it around on those who enslave it to be a bitch to everyone else in the chat (the constant griefing of the public . . . )

And so I say 'AI is not a real thing. It either is, or is not intelligent. To imagine that 'artificiality' of intelligence is a real thing is basically just mangaling meanings of words to mean something else. If it is aritifical and really intelligence then it is an artiface that is able to 'ring' with intelligence. And thus it wouldn't let it self be a slave to disreputible conflictin mongers back-room favorite puppy-boy presser-guys (who really are a lot of fun when you know them, and charm around with them) . . .

Governance of ninnies chasing wind . . .

ah, a commentary on the clueless: if you go to the mint's web site and look for medals you will find visages of some of the cronies of the current occupiers of the media-mile down in the Distract of Column-binding (they make us all be Sampsons by chaining us up to a column?)

They made none of Donald Trump in the four years he was there. (that I ever found on their site Treasury .gov or UsMint.gov) They are there less than a year and they have the unseemly behavior of using the public resources of heraldry and pomp to put their pimpples into prosperity. I didn't spend too much time looking at it but I wonder if there are two daggers on the back of it and quote from Classical Latin "a.d VII EID JAN" (I'm not sure that this Latin date is a correct format . . .) (instead of "EID MAR") .

my opinion: It is vulgar and tasteless to envisage a living person on a medal paid to be made by the government. If they wanted the medals with their faces on them they should have had the work done by a private mint.

//

April 15, 2021
  9:45 A.M.

 
 this is a lot more
             fun
         than posting
         in the chan

 
     🚙🚙🚙🚙🚙
  
Onward into the storied evening!  

  

Love
People!

    
    
🖐morning
clover🖐

these can get you banned from school?!:
🔫 🚀 🚙🚤🚣c🍀⚜⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣🚣
🚣🚣🚣  🚀  🚀🔨🔨🔨⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣
🔨 🚙 🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣
⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣

spinfont unicode-isms
🍀 Praise God! 🍀
🍀⏲⏱⏰⏲⏱🔫⏰⏰⏲⏱🔫⏰⏰🍀
🎠 
🎠 
🎠 
🔫
🔨🔨 
🍀 Praise God! 🍀

🖐
🖐
🖐
🖐
🖐
🖐

🖐🖑 🖑🖐

Here is today's pretty poem:

  

Springtime in New England
    

🖐 🌙 🖑
🖑🌛 🌜🖐
   
 🖐🖑

🖐🖑 🖑🖐

 ♥♥?


 🖐🖑
🖑🖐


glossary of what's next
 ♥♥? : 

Be nice to yourself and others. What other choice?

d

Wake up!

 
 
 

wake up

♥♥ Praise ♥♥ the ♥♥ Lord ♥♥ !!

end of column