The Message Column

Looking for hate is by itself a hateful thing to do.

How would they even know if they found it?

The solution is moderation. The solution is outting the ones who post the vile crap. If they do so will they find out some things that they really don't want to know: that hate doesn't exist and it only is there if you look for it?

Here is the problem: a lot of what is seen as 'hate speach' isn't speach at all, but out put of a bot process. It spamss us all and tries, in a virtual way, to iimpell us to comment: to give free content to the discusion engine so that they can have somethign to sell for the world to buy, to give htem a purpose and to sell the data. So how do we know what is real and what is not real?

And then, if there are people so bold and empowered as to post tripe and hateful stuff, these are people that are capible of a lot of other things too, not just sitting at a keyboard. So doesn't leaving the possiblity open for offense also provide a way for us to be able to know who the people who harbor retrograde concepts about society and other people? And are we sure that we know what 'retrograde' is? Don't we have to look at each poster differently? So if somene who is a Rap Star, a Snoop-daug, posts an N word as a greeting that is totally different than if someone who is known to be a racist does.

If there is to be an effort to try and 'out' the haters, what if they get it wrong? What if it's someone trolling to find people who agree with retrograde comments? We know that a lot of weak minded ethnics will often resort to the pitty-card of doing some vile display of racism or intollerance directed at their own self-identity so that the 'cause' of promoting against that kind of hate (which may be very much gone from many places). The fact is that anti-bigtry and equality efforts are very compelling.

What is it really that needs to be done? Nothing, is my guess. My guess is that the people who ned to know who posted what hateful thing already have access to all of the web logs that htey need to see. So if courts or juries need to be informed then the process of litigation proceeds, and the various orders of courts as to disclousure of who or what produced said content in question can easily be answered by those with a need to know: the white angels of the snoop-tocracy who want us all to play nice and keep the level of paranoia to a hush.

But these private arbiters of opinion can't have access to that. Even in this day that kind of breech would raise eyebrows even farther. And so given that a lot of the spy-structure is a-political, and if some of it is political it might be randomly placed, so that there is no consensus amount the snooperellis of the world (piasaions of a snooper kind, supper snoopers, ppooppper scoopers. They are teh ones who have to go and look for the filth of popp (the poop of hate and incitement) out on the Internet wastelands.

All of that has been in place for a very long time and is doing fine as it is. If you post things threating to people to do them physical harm my guess is that it gets spotted right quick. And if so then my guess you get a visit from some muscley and doe eyed people who will deal with you if you are a threat. Who are these people? Well, as so much of my commentary, they might not even exist but . . . buy the very nature of human society, and teh nightwatch philosophy of those cultures that weren't just absorbed by the slave-monger cultures, the watch and vigilence of valour surveyal goes on, has gone on, and continues, and will continue. And those who look for hate will find it, when they face a mirror.

They find it when they hate the hater. When they create this imaginary person where it might just be a bot, or someone clickbaiting for content. The fact is that no effort to remove 'hate' from the Internet could ever be any good because the whole idea of it is hateful all the way. And the effort to remove hate would put in, and institutinoalize so much hate that it would break the parts of the Internet where such rediculous dictates would be put out.

No, tis better to let it as it is without any bot to snoop for hatered imagined. Let the outrage of society when faced with the vile postings of a dip-wad (dip-wad is a non-hateful term which signifies a person who puts out hateful things because of their own feeelings of insequirity and their own sense of worthlessness).

In my version the 'dip-wad', that dim-bulb person with the sharp wit, but a dull sense of how to be social or kind, that person would be sought out by people who were truly offended by the material presented. And tehy would mitigate through kindness, engage the person and seeing if they really give creedance to the blather that they produce or are they just bored and lonely and need to interact, and just like to be a iddggitt just to seem important and have a sense of accomplishing something, even if it's something stupid like getting people angry. So the person might be a jouvinile behaving person.

But who are these people? Certainly they can't be from teh government. Why? Because the potential for that process to be augmented and abused is too great.

That is why I propose the grudge match 3D video game commenting with a video game quality engine to of the mid 1990's genre games, like Twisted Metal III or other such fun and rompous games. That way the person could be there and 'defend' his point of view and all the other commentors could gang up on him/her/? and have their bumber car blow up (what would happen in Twisted Metal III).

OK, I'm being playful. Bottom line of what I mean: it better serves society to allow people to post what they want. If there is a problem then the content should be moderated. Bots that spot hate? They are the product of control freaks of the private sector who have an edge through ownership of various media outlets and who want to restrict speach based upon concepts of hate which will be abused (could be abused, probably will be by some) to be used to filter out speach of a political nature directed against policies that are not imposed democratically, but through fiat of the governance of some few, unelected, self-entitled, and scared to death to be outed as those of special privledge. They have their nest and they like they way that they feather it and they don't want anyone talking against the plans of the generational posers, who were put there by the genrrational poser parents, and told what to do. Conformism to an extreame. ONly way in is to be susceptible (or pretend to be). If such organizations exist (and they seem to) then they would be the ones whou would love to say that they can sanction or thumbs-down what independant voices say and preach.

Therea re some who claim that certain passages of Christian scripture are 'hate speech', or certain psalms. Do we really want to open the door where scripture is not allowed on line because those not-of-the-faith (whatever faith) don't understand what that scripture?

            🌛 🌜
 When Moons
       Oppose (ver II)

 When Moons 
   Oppose    🌛 🌜
    each other
 and stare off
 into different
  directions
  does the 
 night suffer?
  Do the
   the dancers
  on the bailarisrade
 forget the moves
    and devolve the dance
 to polite mosh?
     
    Does the wind
 forget which way to blow?
     When Moons
    Oppose?   🌛 

rambling rambling and rambling on
Don't you know
dear mommy needs you?
Half way home from sausilito
Don't leave my dear mother alone!
How come you aren't ever home?

hover above images for a modification effect.

hover modifies the back ground for the page.

this image selector div is for the page body background

hover modifies the back ground for the column.

this image selector div is for the column background

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord!
  for    because    
 Easter  He's so awesome! 
  welcome to The Message Column!

      🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
      ♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

What ever happened to the
 . . . tiny popup milkman sprite?

 🖐
 hello!
 

hover above images for a modification effect.

🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

changing it now.

     oh those arbitrary frames!
      spinning, but not this line.
     
spin me a yarn neon
spin me a yarn neon
spin me every where but not here!
here is a fresh link, a new path to some older content:
   photo pile!
   
 

 be both wise and kind

 

wisenkinder

 

In Wicked Need of an Edit

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

Political and Media Inanity

Kafka wrote comedy. Orwell was a pessimist. Depends who you ask.

Truck-u-later

in this column Truck-u-later steps in deeper . . .

May 29, 2016

Billion dollar ideas? They are all around us!

Alright. We'll be changing it up a little bit!.

The conveyed possibility
isn't the same as the actual occurance.
one is a fiction, for the purposes of readership.
The second, a sad and delusional descent into 
a hell of a hall of mirrors: one sees one's own 
hatred reflecting back
from everyone. You don't see them, but
what you reflect
off of them.
You don't know them at all, really, then, do you?
So how can you hate them?

Cal:

"I never minded the surveillance society. I've always been kind of an exhibitionist"

May 24, 2016

"I never minded the surveillance society. I've always been kind of an exhibitionist."

 a beat . . .

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord
  for his    for his    for his
 unfailing  unfailing  unfailing
   love!      love!      love!

  well, nothing more here today.