The Message Column

Climate Change, The UN and the tyranny of false democracy

Ya, all of those bought and paid for people voting for the treaty to make us their slaves. Great. Meanwhile they leave the gates open.

Yes, tiny little countries get the same vote as those with a billion people.

 🖐
 hello!
 

hover above images for a modification effect.

editing takes time.

🖐♥♥Love♥♥🖑
♥♥🖑Cops🖐♥♥

      

hover modifies the back ground for the page.

this image selector div is for the page body background

Remember the Sultana!

April 27, 1865

hover modifies the back ground for the column.

this image selector div is for the column background

     oh those arbitrary frames!
      spinning, but not this line.
     
spin me a yarn neon
spin me a yarn neon
spin me every where but not here!
   photo pile!
   
 Done That!
 
 
 

Dude was sad
today 
doing time
at the art rave
answering calls

Dude is hungry for affirmation
needing to overcome
some sad dark secret time
that he wishes he had better behaved.

Dude is lonly for a soul mate.
Solitary bird.
The mystic is only mystic
when he's alone?
Do I need to rewrite the last sentence 
to include every gender?
I think not.
Mystics come in non determined gender.

Dude was sad
sitting at the art rave
doing time
answering calls.

Shy? Naturally Shy?
The Beau?
The beautiful one?
The shy beautiful one?

Dude is sad
at the art rave
give him a call . . .

 

In Wicked Need of an Edit

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

Political and Media Inanity

Truck-u-later

You're fired . . .

I love how Mr. Donald played the media like a standup bass. He's like this punk-rock musician and he's got his bow and his giant stand-up electric bass instrument. He just bows off a couple of hard arpeggios of 'here's the worst thing we can do' in answer to 'no one can do anything because I am the wonder-king of the world, hail the commander' bit that our gutless leader did on Sunday night.

And so then, Donald, up there on his stage, he just smiles. " oh, you didn't like that one. How about this?" and he comes up with a perfectly reasonable explanation for the views that the spouted on the previous day, and here is what we could really do, now that we know you don't like hearing that other tune.

When a master plays on the stage he (she ?) knows when it falls flat. And someone who's a master on that stage, whose had great success, he knows how to talk to the crowd. In this case he's playing the media like a master plays an antique stand-up instrument, for the crowd.

It's like some in the media, and in politics, forget who he is. Who is he? He's Donald Trump. It's not Pol Pot. It's not Stalin. It's not Queen Victoria. It's not Hitler. It's not Saddam. It's not Momar. It's Donald. And they should already know him as a person not just from his very many appearances over a period of 30 or more years in American media as a constant running gag of sorts. And when did anyone ever expect him to behave any differently than he is right now? He's a master of communicating and understands that concepts are often bantied, and words are not irreversible. Do those who hate him think he's an absolutist? If he were an absolutist with a take-no-prisoners attitude the New Yorkers would have long ago outted him as such and made him reform. So then, what, maybe he's having some kind of fit or bought with Mental Illness? Is that what the media would have us believe?

And if he were wouldn't all the people around him be able to see it? It's far fetched.

So, ya if some crack pot starts putting in actual programs to ask the rudest of questions: are you a . . . that is when to say 'well maybe that's not such a good thing to ask. When they are can't you tell? But when someone from overseas is expecting passage to America and thinks that it's OK to just enter, we can be afforded the descretion to say 'not today'. And if someone were a student of a known jihadist, then we should not just say, "oh, so his religion is supremicism, and, because of freedom of religion, we have to let him in even though his practice of religion is to limit our ability to practice our religion". So what is the argument? That if we don't let him in to the United States than we are violating his rights to practice his religion? How is that? It's not true. He/she/whatever can practice his/her/whatever religion back where they are from.

Often this comes from people who would be quick to take away other rights, such as the ones guaranteed by the first and second amendments. Many believe that there should not be any laws to establish a religion here, and that gets reinterpreted to mean that basically government must do a hands off on all religion. Some could take it even farhter and argue, with an extension of the interpretation done in the same way as other extensions of interpretation, that because government must not establish religion it must then also prevent supremicist sects, of any belief or religion, from being allowed access to our country if those members don't give up their supremacist ideologies. Such an interpretation might ban a lot of very different kinds of people and it would be based upon the way that our people feel about them. Such a kind of ban, then, is almost impossible. People would just lie about what their beliefs are. And 'our' people might prove to be major bigots.

While we are at war, and with the possibility of dishonorable war mongers continuing as leaders, we should know that some of these sects, from over there, have missions here and do us harm. And some of them seek conquest of our country. Can't we be spared people like that?

Even if there were no Muslims of the supremacist sort, other people would still harbor supremicist ideologies. Such ideologies are not limited to Muslims. So even if all Muslims were not supremicist, the problem would arise from some other sector.

So it's the absolutism and the supremicism that is loathsome. And that is not just in religion, but also in other areas, like in politics. The absolutism and supremicism of various cults of politics are also a sad plauge upon the democracies. We have to endure it. And safe passage, just let it happen. When it makes sense. But when it doesn't make sense, when it's better for them to stay away for a while while we work through our obvious issues, our friends will understand. They will accept that the mad season has not yet passed, that caution is needed. They will be OK with us needing our space. They will not force their nascent understanding of 'religious liberty' as an excuse for ignorance of an obvious invasion.

People have eyes, and they see stuff for themselves. And they have ears and they eaves drop in the aisles at the store and listen to what people say. We see the hard looks, the soft looks, and we kind of have a sense when people are inclusive and loving. But we also understand that very many people have xenophobic hangups. In the meantime, while we are at war, the xenophobic hangups of foreigners from a war zone need to not become our problem here. We have enough of our own xenophobia to deal with already in America, without importing a very virulent kind: Pan-Arab-supremacism and the weaponization of discontented youth.

Ya, so, again, I'll say it: disagree with Trump. Of course. But don't trash him. If they can trash him they can trash anyone and no one is then worth anything. You don't have to vote for him. But you should not have to hate him.

Dec 10, 2015

We sure do need a billion dollar idea.

. . . what if they made a giant inflatable mattress/solar cell twice the diameter of the earth and put it in orbit in front of the sun . . .

I am sure that if they did that we would then really need a climate conference. And we'd tell them to move their solar collector somewhere else.

In order to protect the Earth from near earth gamma burst we need a louvered blind system, constructed from asteroids, that will fit around the Earth and the moon. Tell that to the grant hounds and maybe they can work on something real for a change. The problem has already been solved, at least in the world of fiction. And, of course, all of the details of it were covered up and all of the players in those projects will always deny that any of it ever happened. Becuase it didn't.

At the end of the play everyone gets to go home, don't they?

I know that there is a parody in it some where:

Putin on The Rich


Payback is a bitch
Putting on the rich.


I've got no inspiration, just
a pathetic pun for a title.


to the tune of Irving Berlin's, of course.

can it ever be funny?

She might be a faux-hadi if . . .

Her bridal registry is at a gun shop

  Praise     Praise     Praise
   the        the        the
   Lord       Lord       Lord
  for his    for his    for his
 unfailing  unfailing  unfailing
   love!      love!      love!

  well, nothing more here today.