March 21, 2014

Spring is finally here.

But there are no crocuses like in years past at this time. Usually at the beginning of March I first find crocuses in my yard.

How about some new fiction?

He told me "Isn't it better to wait through it?" I was glad that I took his observations to mind and decided, after a time, that the sudden movement that I had imagined would be necessary wasn't going to help me or anyone else. If the bridge or the town or the tower have problems that can't be solved we make a new bridge, we gather up the people of the town and reconstitute it. We can build a new tower if the old one crashes.

He told me to wait till it was all through, that it would work out better if there were no sudden movements, no drastic decisions, no betting on total failure of everyone around you.

If you bet on the total failure of all around you: society, the rule of law, the love between nations; then you can never win that bet. If it happens as you describe in your business plan (that you have written in your mind) that everything around is failure then . . . you can't win that. Wish for better things. Plan for better things. If everything you plan is for failure than the only success that you will have is failure. Hard to understand?

The failure of others is never successful business. Nor is it good government. Other people having problems and being driven into poverty is never good for any one else. If they think that it is, see how far down they have fallen, how much they fail with that bad attitude.

Anyone who thinks that making money off of driving others into ruin is good business is already a failure, no matter what the business does, how much money it makes.

I'm not talking about Socialists. Because the idea of that is that no one knows anything better than the ones who were selected as the 'best and the brightest' by arbitrary assertion of institutional, and usually non-democratic, authority. And not for the well-being of the public but for the well being of the institution (frag).

A public institute must be tasked with the well being of some aspect other than itself or else it has no function other than self-preservation. That state that is set up as a monolith with no other form of anything, no innocents to protect, no preserve from which they stand aside and let the world be . . . any institute that behaves as if they are the all-and-only . . . an institute that actually disdains the public, an institute that is used as a political brick to bash in opponents . . . such institutes are in dire need of either disbandment or reform if they would ever even be able to fall that far, as if people are so dark as to allow it. Isn't the 'rotten to the core' anything (any institution) just a worst case fiction of a creative and dramatically inspired mind?

Any who that go-on-about how such-and-such governmental agency ought to be reformed or done away with must understand that all agencies are designed for a real function in the first place. That a previously considered valid (and most probably still is) function is subverted for the good of the few over the many by some that does not negate the general need for whatever the organization's function was supposed to be. For example if we were to abolish the [some federal agency] then who would [their actual useful function]. (yes I do not want to draw anyone's ire.)

And if we were to abolish the [other fed agency], then who would [their actual function]?

And so those who go on about how [some federal agency] and [other fed agency] are abusing their power . . . and blah blah blah. what is it really? What would it be called really if the prosecutors were actually allowed to do their jobs? What would they call the things that are going on that some see as illegal and immoral: the politicization of these agencies so critical to the functioning of the bureaucracy? These are necessary parts of our system that even if they were abolished they would just pop right back up in a different form with all the same people doing most of the same jobs and . . . what else would anyone have happen?

It is wrong for people to criminalize gun owners with the single stroke of their magic pen on a piece of paper. Equally wrong is to demonize all of the members of a bureaucracy because of the (alleged) criminal acts of a few.

Do I know of any such acts? I am not tasked to come up with such a list. Also I understand that the CYA aspect comes into play. No one wants a federal bureaucrat to get snared up into some 'good-guy-governance' dragnet and then have to hear about it in the press for weeks and months and years and decades and stab in the back a good friend who did good by everyone . . .

But isn't there a level of federal corruption were even cowed bureaucrats and lower level functionaries start to say 'enough is enough' and then resign their offices? The facts of having to pay bills often means that people don't do that. They have very strong rights and strong support from fully unionized shops and a longevity, if they want it, that exceeds that of elected officials, especially a corrupted [some branch of government], if that is what is really going on here.

And if there were sad dealings of criminal nature, it would be the dealings of the few. It would never be that everyone knew and no one cared and they all just laughed about it. Secret Cinema? That is just a paranoid movie. Real governments are never really like that. Nothing is ever as corrupt as it can be imagined.

So if there were bad people doing bad things it would be kept from the golfers and world-traveler wind-surf set of big-marble chess piece administration. The king and the queen and the bishop, the generals and the stage puppet clowns would all be kept from the real story. They would be untouchable.

And even if there were evidence, after, when the new party of whoevers is in power, most of the time in America, in the West, these things are just swept up into the dust bin of history. Give the old guy some important place to build a museum and let him leave us now, in peace. The good-willed bureaucrat stuck within a bad period of history will wait it out, play the game, try to maintain the order by being one of the bricks that won't crack, won't let the wall fall down.

The whole crop of elected people can be scoundrels and thieves and those bricks will not crack beneath the weight of the corruption. The bureaucrat is a hardy creature with a strong back. The carpet bagger? He can pull his magic lamp-stand from his Mary-Poppins bag, and build a carousel of lies and make the media ride it, he can send himself (herself and her kids and mom) on trips that the press can not tag along on . . . and . . . it's all paid for because it is 'diplomacy'. The perks of being . . . a straw with full suction.

The world will not crumble. The order will not collapse. Most people in government are not criminal at heart. Most times that they help you they help you well. We are not 'sheeple'. The whole world isn't collapsing. There is no ruling class. There are no 'banksters', they are a fiction like 'James Bond'.

I'm always in need of a good editor! Know anyone?

Hey, you want to check out a cool page I've been working on today? It's also got a 'why don't we BASH for a while' explanation on automatic content generation utilizing the ubiquituos BASH shell. Here is a link

It's a fine page and it works in firefox. It can easily be modified to work in pretty much every browser that has CSS3, Javascript enabled.

  🌛 🌜  When Moons
       Oppose (ver III)

 Moons 
   Oppose
    each other
 and start off
 into different
  directions.

 The world suffers
   when one gets lost
  and the other has to 
   double back
      to find them.

  End the dance and send
      the guest out 
   to join the search
   no one wants rest
 until the loved-ones are 
            found.

 
   the dancers
  on the bailarisrade
 forgot the party
    and evolved into
 a determine effort
    to find the lost
  and bring them home.
 
     
    The wind does not forget
         to weep for the lost
              song bird.
 forget which way to blow?
     What Moons would ever oppose
       bring the nestlings
             home?     🌜🌛

🌛 🌜              🌛 🌜
🌛 🌜              🌛 🌜 
🌛 🌜              
🌛 🌜              🌛 🌜

Unicode is like the new feature of the utility knife that you suddenly discover and wonder why you hadn't picked up on it before.

It's so much fun I don't have the heart to delete the silly lines here, and get on with the rancid morbidity of January urges like I did before. Thats a joke. How can we be sad when we can play the music? 🎵 🎶 🎷 🎸 🎹 🎺 🎻🎼

teacher gives an 🍎 teacher puts an 🍏 on the desk.

I drive a 🚎 to go surfing. I drive a 🚎 to the sea. I have a 🚎 to go surfing. rushing walls of water over me.

take a 🚊 take a 🚋 take a 🚌 take a 🚍. take a 🚎 or a hot air 🚏 or a 🚐 take a 🚑 through take a 🚒 with you. pray for all who drive 🚓. be kind when the guy who drives 🚔 who pulls you over. pull over 🚕 and enjoy the view. take a 🚖 from the hotel to the plane. rent a 🚗 for a drive up the ocean lane, switch backs and across the scene with you on your holy day, every day may that be for you.

my 🚘 broke so I rented a 🚙 and my friend drove the 🚚 that we had rented and at the toll booth the toll guy said remember to yield to the 🚛 and the 🚜 and especially when you get to the amusment park because the 🚝 and the 🚞 and 🚟 and 🚠 and 🚡 all go over the highway. If you go to Roswell maybe you'll see a 🚢. But it's probably just a 🚣 from the Airbase up wind. because they used to fly hot air 🚏 there in the middle of the night, by the light of the moon 🌑 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌙 🌚 🌛 🌜 🌝. 🚤 🚥

🚦 🚧 🚨 🚩 🚪 🚫 🚬 🚭 🚮 🚯 🚰 🚱 🚲

If I revert to hyroglyphs will anyone even know what I'm saying?

If I retro-gress to hyroglyphs will anyone even know when I digress?

hyro-gressives buying coffee at a yard cart.

When using words to say important things the use of hyrogressive unicodisms is to be avoided. No law professor nor judge, nor officer of a court will allow the hyroglyphic quality of unicodisms without those being of value and relavance to the case at hand. Show offs beware.

My point: creativity like what is above is for the art and overbearing egoists 🎵 🎶 🎷 🎸 🎹 🎺 🎻 🎼 🎵 🎶 🎷 🎸 🎹 🎺 🎻🎼 page, something that if fully appropriate for a page like this one.

italic opposing moons:
  🌛 🌜  When Moons
       Oppose

bold opposing moons:
  🌛 🌜  When Moons
       Oppose

bold italic opposing moons:
  🌛 🌜  When Moons
       Oppose

Safty first: retrofit cabinet locks!

Always in Need of edit

In Wicked Need of an Edit

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

Political and Media Inanity

by Truck-u-later

Mute!

But really not!

Wake up and pray for peace.

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

I provide no answers. Just remember who your friends are. And who are very unfriendly.

It is 2014, not 1914. No need for big wars anymore.

🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

check back here later for more In Wicked Need

  . . . well . . . 
     Truck-you-later!

 Truck-u-later is a
  guest columnist.
🚛 🎓 🎔 🌀

14 Feb, 2014.

Please view my Very Many Hearts demo.

Very Many Hearts

more from a newer fiction

what say ye oh milkman-popup sprite?

Milkman red devil popup :

"Merry Christmas!"

Sometimes it is best to wait with jokes.



 

There is a story in 2 Samuel about a guy who is hurling rocks at King David from way up high.
David doesn't let his guys go and get the guy because he knows that the guy throwing stones
had a good reason to do it. He was angry.





 © 2014 © Amillia Publishing Company © 2014 © 
 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜  🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 
 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜  🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 
 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜  🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 
 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜  🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 
 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜  🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 


 when moons dream
 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜  🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 🌛 🌜🌛 🌜 
         in each others eyes (ver II)

  When moons dream
   into their lover's eyes
     a true love lock of
          gaze that they
      wish to not break,
           it's a hard thing 
        to come to, that pathos of imagining
           separation
         from the bliss of
     being so close
       to one so true and real. 
  the heavens are so much
         in motion
 as is the churning  sea
      of every ocean
    and to catch a close up look,
          like when moons lock eyes,
      comes so rare, that when to find it
           one must soul-search and self-deny
         and almost be willing to die
     like comets that collide
          on a midnight 
   horror ride of pride in you!
        Sempre Fe!
        the fear of loosing
         the happy view of the other's face
   when moons lock each other's eyes
      there are no more true and loving cries
     than the fond good byes as they
  wind off in orbit
      to the very far away
     as close as close can be
          forever.
      when moons lock in each other lover's eyes.
🌜🌛
🌜🌛
🌜🌛
🌜🌛

2014 © 2013 © Amillia Publishing Company 2014 © 2013 © 2014