Dead show Cancelled!
 
Did you ever make someone's day
by just being a little groggy when
they call you for a job?  The kid's 21
and I looked him up online and found
out he's an intern.  What a thing is that
some kid calling me because of this poem-page
web-blog, a complete and utter website of
perposterousity and new words.

If you had the add-ons and I could watch 
where you were reading on a screen I'd
have an application that would melt the
screen in some patented way as a litterary 
effect.  So when you are reading the part
about people on mushrooms the screen would
start swirling.  You'd, of course, have the
chair and monitor add-ons (your a cutting edge
citizen of the Internet).  Maybe you're strapped
into your flight simulator (you live and work
in The Virtual World).

The Virtual World becomes the real world. The
medium is the message.  Anyone who takes pictures
can only talk about cameras and lenses.  Anyone
who writes in a newspaper . . . (well they are
out of a job, I guess) can only talk about
print media 'the press'.  Well they are very pressed,
now, aren't they?  The method of control by
blizzards of paper onto which are printed assorted
truths and lies (and no obvious method for a neophyte
to ascertain which are which) is obsoleted by
The Internet and the Poetry-Blog-snot rant page (fully
protected by LIBERTY).  Treat that you blog-snot waanna-bees.

When I started these ranticules cubicles (the 'common
content entity') it merely allowed me to have
mulitiplicity of presentation of many various forms and
formats (all at the same time) with serialized content entities
and common content containers and programmable discrete
website interface (all of my design).  I've got the stuff,
their, blokes.  All you website wanna-bes?  You gotta
have something to say.  You have to have a way to
put it forward for the people to read.  Some kid who
goes to Yale calls me like he has a job for me because
of my blog-snot-rants and you tell me that this
is a waste of time?  I'm reaching folks and hopefully
ripping open a hole in the curtain into which they've
been woven.  It's a valid activity to try and pry
open the bolted close crypt into which they try to
skully-wag and bone (up the . . . ) these young
impresionables.  The fact of sleep deprivation.  The fact
of the need to do too much work.  The fact of the
polemic of don't dare say an opinion of your own.
All of this  - - - training for the young initiate.

And is there a time when the put the worm up to their ear?
I've never seen it.  It's the poison that gets poured into
an ear.

When folks are young they are driven by hormones.  They 
have a priority to fight and fornicate.  So it is.  That's
just a fact, jack.  And so we let them vote at 18 when they
are still very much juveniles.  They vote at 18.  They vote 
based upon 'feelings' sleep deprived, group think
stuff, joined a group to effect change.  They 
don't know how to schedule their time.  They don't know how
to cook for themselves.  But they vote.

OK.  I know it isn't true what I write above.  There are plenty
of very responsible 18 year olds out there.  They already have
kids.  They know how to cook for 4.  They run a house.  They
take care of their elders.
Yes, there are these people.  But I bet very very few in the
Ivy Leauge.

I say anti-trust the Ivy League.  Anti-trust the power-elite.
But it is just talk.  It's really a very scarey idea.  What
would we then have?  If we kill our own power-plant, the way
that we let things flow out to the world, what new way of
power will arrise?  Outlaws?  The real revolution is private
and personal.  It must become from within the mind of yourself.
It should not be imposed upon others.

There is a necessary realignment of power that will occur.
It will happen in gradual ways.  It's not that we need to do
all of this right now.  That is foolish and wreakless.  The 
folks that like to 'effect change' that are over the age
of 25 are most likely on the inside of some scheme that
wants to profit from the change.  For example, as an exercise,
could a student of 'change' make a list of the things that
would profit various (un named) entities by the various
'effective changes' that are foisted upon an unsuspecting public?

I used to read The Harvard Business Review when I worked for
the Air Force.  I just put myself on the list so that when
the other guys were done, ie the CEO of my division, Neil Stark,
I would get the magazine.  And then I would thumb through it.
It was never anything that you could read through all of the way.
The thing was like 300 pages every month.  But what they did have
were these 'scenarios' where they would run down various ways
that 'situations' can play out.  So a company would be presented,
a fictional company, with a list of 'as ifs' and then a 
very well thought out discussion about the consequences of
various types of behavior.

We are thought in a good school to be able to make up these
scenarios.  But they do not teach us a moral way to use them.
The ethics part of it is required for some things.  But the codes
that are suggested are often not followed.  And then we
ahve whole schools dedicated to 'government' run by folks
that have no natural ability to lead or do anything other than
win a popularity contest.  When all of these high officials
get together and they concoct a narative that . . . explains
some 'consequence' of some action that 'if not taken' will result
in some kind of horrid and deplorable 'imagining of a dreaded future.'
It's called 'scare-mongering' and the folks who do this are known
as 'scare-mongerers'.  They don't, of course, call themselves that.

The problem we have now as a society is that those of us
who are not on the inside of the global-arlarmist agenda
have discovered that this is the case.  WE know that there
are monied-sots who fund malingerer causes:  causes that
result in accounting practices being applied in places
where they have not traditionally been applied previously.
The want to count cow flatulenze.  They want you to pay for
every Carbon Dioxide molecule.

So we've exposed the fraud and now we have not yet thrown
out the government that ate the lies hook-line-and-sinker.
All for donations to their dubious web of phoney charities
that live and fester within the otherwise laudible field 
of 'non-profits'.

And we are discouraged from trying to figure out who
weaved all of these lies into this elaborate fantasy of
the global alarmists.  It doesn't matter if you prove
or disprove anything.  As soon as you debunk some junk 
science that the asleep-at-the-trouth crowd are
worshiping (at the behest of 'funders') they will come
up with something else.
So if it isn't that an asteroid is going to come (according
to them) and destroy civilization, so fund space research;
then it's that SARS is going to kill everyone and everyone
needs to by higene products of particular type;
or how about war with [some country] must happen because
if it doesn't then they will develop [some technology
that has already been invented elsewhere] and this will
be bad for the cause of [some group of religious nationalists].

And the result is always 'so let us do what is otherwise
absurd'.

Anyone who studies formal logic and philosopy see the non-sequetor
nature of these kinds of arguments.  For example it seems
that the weak-minds of chattering class of political-powermad 
always have the following kind of arguement (not for everything,
they are not wrong about everything):

[some horrible thing] so [more power for the federal beaurocracy].

or 

[some moral failing of elected people] so [shirking of the responsiblity
of elected officials to a quasi-governmental agency]

So what is the solution?
Get in volved.
Speak up.
Let your outrage be voiced.
adhere to principles of non-violence.
Shout love at haters.

"You will over come your political hate.
You will have success for the causes that you
believe in that have actual merit and virtue.
you will overcome your lusts for change.
You will respect the things that are established
that work and the standards that our elders
have devised.  You will not just effect change
for the hell of it.  You will be a moral person."

Are we up for the task? So go out there, folks, and
change yourself!

WP
July 1, 2010

The thoughts expressed above are spontaneous
and unedited.  They may, in fact, need an editing.
If you are offended by anything that I have said
above, then good thing you still have the capacity
to feel.  It means you aren't really a reptile
like some people might say of you.  LOL 


Solstice Sunset






  




7:01 PM
June 22, 2010