The Left Column

Politics for Poets

How do you catch

A really big fish?

Gang of Thralls

I've never actutttally watched 'gang of thungs', the media-property epic fake-oppothy story about creepy cretin creatures masquerading as human's being out in the wild lands of some other realm (the story realm). But what we see in Washington with the imapplement of the president is close to what I imagine institutionally corrupt people would go on with. There is no logic to what they do. They are on a vendetta of mean and cringe-worthy political grandstanding. Everything that they breath, do, and say is there to corrupt the process of honest electioneering (a fiction?) and to skew the view to you that would make you see it their way (with mirrors, and smoke, probably crack-smoke. Or they are smoking meth. Or they just get it as a dose from being in proximity of some of the others who do, a contact buzz. Maybe the only light is from a gaslight.

I've divorced myself from the idea that anything honest goes on in those hallways. You always get the 'doncha dontcha ever tell' entreats and the magical hand gesturing of the bun-headed director of their poison choir. I just can't sing along, I'm sorry, as soon as she gives me that look of 'I control you', because we're not singing about . . . what the song says, but then it becomes them in charge, just to be in charge, and no real purpose but their hegemony over the congregation. And in that crowd (not one in church, because I might be wrong about that) there aren't any virtuous. But the group think of the bun haired and the behavior of puppet-spokes-maums with the obvious connections, the 'try-too-hard' crowd. The 'you never do enough' crowd. The 'you ought to know better' crowd. the real truth with that crowd, when it comes to your opinion of them, is that they won't ever give you any leeway to diverge from their septic puking points (not talking points, because talk is talk cofffeee talllk, like chalk, that draws a nice image but we can erase it in a second, nothing permanent).

what we see from the festering bog of Wishington is that they wish that a ton of crap would fall upon the guy who they dislike. Meanwhile they continue with their rampage of yumming it up on the government nickel. And I'd really like to know what Archer Biddy was doing in You-crane? I'd like to know (Archer Biddy? Who that?)

You know Archer. Archer take an arrow and shoot it at something. The long bow was a great invention that freed some people from being able to just be rolled over. You shoot from far away and their maces and axes and stone clubs do nothing to you. It's kind of a weapon against tyranny, that's what they must have told the boys who they gave these dangerous weapons of terror, and why they are not so popular anymore. It's an obvious thing but you know, my mind is clever and I don't share the weapon clever. (why give away sick headed ideas about how to efficiently do what is horrible? why, because you are either psychopathic (what does that mean?) or just naive to the conjuring (toys and weapons don't have to be much different, see how litigious weaponized defective or misused toys and collect jack-pot sized settlements, a kind of looting) (they would argue that they are 'protecting' the 'children')

Seen on a stall circa 1979: "save the . . . . and win valuable prizes"

So if you read the transcript of the phone call to the newly elected person over there, a place that had been a vassal-like entity run by the . . . , if you read through it there seems to be nothing collusional, no quid pro quo, persee, but what we see is a collection of statements that indicates a bigger story (a back story) about Ukraine which the dimwits who use this conversation against Trump want to pretend isn't even there.

for example we can read that the Presidents are talking about various topics of on-going investigations. Now Mr. President (Sir) is the President of the United States of America, and I support him in that role. If he were shown to be the same kind of creep as say, Jeffy Eppy (Eppy pen? are you saying the guy was drug connected) then I wouldn't support that kind of behavior (nine times out of ten maybe you get it right, that other time, maybe the nine time, they flip their point of view and I say " I support your right to be totally wrong about Donald, but I still enjoy hearing your go on with your pronouncements of what you are 'sure' about , but "I could always be wrong". Yes, me too. I can be wrong. And words shouldn't be nooses.

So the hearsay of quid pro quo is the accusation against our president. He was trying to gather intelligence data concerning insider dealings and a fire prosecutor in the Ukraine. One wonders how that translates? and there are some things that I would love more detail concerning that get hinted-about within that conversation. As well it's said that the 'whistleblower' would have been committing an illegal act in reporting this if rules had not just recently been changed to make it OK to be this kind of accuser, one who didn't hear anything, and doesn't have a memory of anything, because they are repeating what they heard through eavesdropping. (is that fair?)

And the hatcheteers (the Pelosi-teers) want to 'protect' the identity of this person and allow for a secret accuser. Of course that isn't going to be allowed. The person must be known, if they make such accusations, they need to be known.

Should I give quotes? It's easy enough for you to get a copy of the transcript, and I don't have it in Ascii form, but in screen cap form, so if I quote it it would be me typing in words. what if I get it wrong?

But if you go and you read it and find what they were discussing: a fired prosecutor. Who was that? why did he get fired? What was Archer Feltcher doing in Ukraine? Why was that (Archer Feltcher?)

Biddy Hunter? What was the guy doing, how did he get so rich, why did he have waviers? Who might have won the election in Ukraine if it wasn't the person who won? Why is Ukraine such a coveted place (by the covenous?).

The coven of one world government usurps the idea of independent nations (united) into an unholy special-citizen coven of control. I say 'coven' to mean unholy group but a group is only unholy if the people are doing evil things. So it's possible that the term can be used in a way that doesn't cast dispersion upon the group: for example we might make the statement "The Spellmans" (TM'd name of characters I don't own) " had a coven of caring, concern, and love". That is from a popular fiction that is recently made dark (by the holly-wierds) but it was always about light and love and ascension and being good and, if not so-called holy, at least not even a little bit evil. Is that a fiction?

So the coven of control in the festerbog is out for the president's blood and we are here to watch this as they do not even go for the details of what the president was actually talking about, the subjects of his sentences, but what the hearsay was from some spy who was nested into the oval office.

So all the narratives that we get from this imstrawwberryment of the president (I use a different fruit in the name, but it's obvious what i mean. Search engines might not see), all of the narratives make the democrats look dim and craven. They seem as hang -wringing plotters. This is at the level of The Dreyfus Affair (from France) where someone was accused of false charges. But in this case the world isn't going to let this particular mean-girl group to get away with their mean-girl ways. The anchor will drop through the deck of their boat much like the plot of a popular movie about guys on the golf course (and will Dan-the-Man be there smiling in role of . . . ?? ? Dan the who?)

Those who know know who Dan is, and that he is a main man.

What I see from here is that this impeachment is destined to fail for the Democrats. They were given the 'go all in' and set their minions in motion to start the first shot in their revolution (are you extreme in saying this) because world revolution can not wait. (you are making this up)

I admit that it's a story, that I don't have privy to any of the conversations that Democrats have. but what I do know is that the sex-cult governance is being deconstructed. The blackmail of control is still in force for a lot of people, I suppose. They are all comped to some degree, and all of us have dossiers on us if we become a problem to 'them' (are you back to your Grange of Thralls theme? seems like it).

So do read an 'annotated' version of the president's conversation where all the subjects are discussed in greater detail. Like one that has the name of the prosecutor (I don't even know that) or other items of interest like just how much money to did Archer extract from Ukraine (Hunter!).

And why do I write in this style?

Because fiction is the only thing that gets through the cracks of their firewalls and blockering. this, is, of course, one such concoction of narrative. I give you no nooses for me. You have none for Donald. He is the master of trolling and the Democrats have bit hard on the hook. The details of what Donald discussed with the president of the Ukraine, once they become well known, will snag the jerky haters.

Trollio, I say.

Settlement

Perdue Pharmacutical

Huricanes can be political.

it's almost perverse that these attorneys general want to have the government get into the opiod business! Oh, it will be a 'non profit' and we see how that goes. I looked for financials from a non-profit in the news. They pretend to be about 'the children'. I'll be very hard on them so I won't give the name, but just about any of them that plaster photos of children on their pages will do and look for their finanicals, they will be billed as a public charity.

And just annecdotally,and it makes my blood boil, I see some numbers that don't make sense. they don't list their saleries. THey show 'investments' that are larger than the payouts that they make to their 'clients'. I don't buy it, to me they seem 'in the way' and they are there to syphon money to themselves, that's what it llook like to me but . . . I've not reviewed all of them. And I'm sure that some of them are good. but to say that 'most are good?' in the case of these 'social service' advocacy groups that turn the down town in to a circus every 3rd of the month . . . no, I don't buy into it. It is a kind of social enslavment of the poor to a class of 'overlookers' who profiteer off of the poverty, so they have no incentive to try and solve the problems of these people. . . . or is this me giving a jaded Aunn Runt point of view (the wisdom of selling psuedo philosopicial novels?) or was it about selfishness? the wise don't buy into the cause of the pain for the few, they say 'that interpretation is bogus, there must be some there who are doing good?' and we say 'well who is it?'

So we get to read the financials. And to me using a child as a prop in the pictures is a marker that these people do not 'get it.' Social advocacy isn't slavery but some of them make it seem as though they are the group think. Instead I'd set it all up a bit differently and see how far they go wiht it, but they wouldnever change it to be a true democracy. You'd see how quickly that would looted too.

Keep the government out of the opiod business. Keep them out of the marijuana business. See how that mayor was accused recently (I noted it) of extorsion.

same thing different year

The 'ad free' internet. This has been that, these pages, except for my shameless self shilling.

It was my idea first. I refused to get suckered into Google, I wasn't here to sell out.

And so what, how holy am I? I could have set up other pages that would do that, but I chose not to. (lazy sad sap?).

A huricane in 1938 that hit the South Coast of New England gave a great motivation to citizens to support better weather reporting, and, as well, a view from space as an aspiration. That storm was a cusp. Hurricanes are cusps. What happens after is much different than what went on before. the storm in 1938 destroyed thousands of homes. Some communities were washed away forever. (little Summer hamlet places, mostly, and later it was deemed to dangerous to rebuild.) Now in those places there are still Summer homes, but they aren't expected to last very long. And often there is hurricane construction.

So now the current storm is 'resting' or 'sitting on' the Bahama Islands. Churning away. It's not restful to ahve that all around you, even if you were in the eye.

The residents of the South Coast of Massachusetts, the State of Rhode Island, the State of New York (Long Island) and Conneticuit had only their barrameters are warning! A sudden plunge. Some weather service guy in Philadelphia was said to have dropped the ball . . . and so the news did not get out in time to save lives. Little or no warning. How different it is now.

Even if you took 'concrete steps' or fabricated them for your dwelling, that great big storm didn't care at all. Concrete steps will last through the storm, maybe be in the surf for a while, they won't be washed very far. The rest of the home, however, might be way up the bay, off towards the town and the salt marshes, far down the Summer beach, a summer place it's fun to arrive and leave the same day, hve a day in the Sun. Fish along the breakwater. Go take a hike all the way around the Island. Some peoplee will kyack there because once around Gooseberry Island and you are back where you started. And you can watch the big ships that go by, some times container ships, too, hugging the horizon like a vision through the haze of a Summer day.

Knocker Blocking

Knocker Blocking is done by Knocker Blockers. Notable is what Youtube does. What Twitter will do. What Google will do. They delist or otherwise fraudulently hide or block the access through a number of different means, all of this without any real rules except for the arbitrary authority of people who, usually, seem to be globalist and anti-american (the corporate honchos at various publicly traded entities).

we need new rules
Internet is akin to a Public meeting house, or a 
common.

Corporations should be able to have rules
but . . . they need to be open and they need to be
quick.
and they ought not be controlled
by the corporation but by some other entity
and also there is a clear intent by some
in social-media to merely be gate keepers, they
claim title to use-cases of modern
communications
which clearly they merely squated on, 
and chased others out of
often with rules imposed by political friends
and has created a usecase of control of
the channels, even to the point
that they attack anyone who provides an
alternative, 
such as 
8ch (and they did for months and months)

Knocker blocker
in a stunning Summer Shocker
I know!
I know I know I know I know!

Discourse

Mission

Everyone needs a purpose and a mission. You can tune-in to some people's.

When things flash, like you are there at the rug part of the store (store of interesting ideas?) and you 'see' a conceptualization of presentation of content analogous to the way that rugs hang at a store liket hat, and you flip through them. Easy Peasey? why give it away? Can it be patented? the presentation of content as flipping images. What kind of images would you flip at someone who told you that they 'owned' that idea? clearly the idea of owning an idea like that is vanity, vanity, and chasing after wind. It's a control freakishness that make every writers day like Halloween. "I'm from Trolliollio, patent monger central, and I own you and your idea now give me all your money"

"What's that?"

but do not idea makers deserve to be protected? So that their ideas are not just stolen away from them? But the effect is, instead, on account of the spyish nature of people with a business prowl going on (like the X-mentos of cancy flavored Italian fruit chew gue-candy, the equivalent to 1980's Itallian Disco?

It's the same thing in music. There really is nothing new under the sun in terms of 'tune' and 'song', in that it's all theoretically possible, given that matter and energy are the same thing and 'energy' being the raw form, matter is the facts of something that happened before? and trapped the energy? We can make up speculation but don't dare post it anonymously at 8Ch this week (because 8ch is still blockered from the INternet?)

I found myself sitting at the thrift store talking about 8ch in a crappy old chair that I noticed put a bruise on the bottom of my leg from sitting in it, Worry worry worry. And I explained aobut 8ch to a guy whose 'holding on' to his tech job at the important laboratoy. What did I say? that it had horrible anti-someone content and that it "couldn't possible be organic"

He asked me who put it up there, then, when it was there at the top of the bread for weeks and weeks in every bread?

How do you say or explain 'who' does that kind of thing? No person could have done it, no sigle individual, unless they didn't sleep that much.

It could have been one person with some scripts. It was most likely a team.

I would say that the forum of free speech is intentionally sullied up by control freak askhouelles and that's because they (which they?) don't want us to have free speech, to be able to share, without them knowing who we are and then bullying us not to.

But which they? Which they? Which they is it and why cna't you tell us who it is? now if you see it as analogy, they can't show you who they 'are' because they aren't anything. They will never be proven to be anything. It's the lurk in the shadows and piss on the crowd below the balconies in a bold fashion, but in the dark. And at 8ch it was a shower of urinary infection of the minds-of-shills, relentless and unstoppable. If you have an Enviromental Protection Agency of mind, it would have to go take a look at what 8ch was. What it can't be again. The test is done, that forum doesn't work. you need some kind of staffing to bascially say 'you ought to have known that we knew it was you and what you were doing, that we always knew. If we thought of you as being loving and kind, if not a bit overly rambunktious and purposefully forward in your ramble-pamballing going on and on and on, it's Sunday. i would have been watching the tailings of a podcast, or the podcast never happened, and here I am stuck inside the sadness of saying 'what is up with those who do that kind of thing, try to shout down free speech? As if all the IPs weern't logged (and I mean the Ver VI logs including node data linked into a GIS system.

But if you knew, you'd know, that the honey paught isn't a kind of marijuana. And that's a clear thing and if you are delusional you think you can say things as an adult, in wartime (because in cyberspace it's been a war for some long years now starting around the time of the Eygptian waking in I'm going to say July of 2013, or was it two years earlier?

So the answer of 'who' was doing it? And why they would want to do a frame-job on thousands of lurkers? the person who posts owns the post. no one else is held responsible. To say that a throw away shifftpost aboutnonsense, and a threat, like flying the same plane over the same route everday, just out of reach of ground artiliary, and too quickly for the other planes to catch it, at some random time in the day, they'd post what is tecnhnically known as a 'shillpost' (I suppose it's not really technical but you're supposed to get the joke). And the 'shill' mentality was to just barrage the board with constant repettive continuous operational (for the purposes of psychological torture) postings about over-cute-faced kittens dressed up like Hitler (the photographer should have to face an angry crowd of ASPCA for torturing the kittens in a photo shoot?) but it will be proven to be some benign 'artistic creation' and then the other operational torture are borderline pornime of the too young to not be creepy variety. And we are supposed to not say to them (because 'don't respoind to shills') that they are borderline mentally diranged. So they say filter. and then someone claiming there are seven dwarf mainframes that have morphed into annoying channel trolls. That's elaborate. And far fetched. and tottally just a LARP? Or is it? Or the one who agreesiively calls people by a name that is even creepy to intimates, but that used to be OK, and a term of affection, and some claiming that's the same one who . . . it reads like a bad comic book novel.

So what was it, and why put up with all that? Did you ever play a mid 80's vintage 'aggrivation' game where the no-win is that no matter what you do you will get splatted. You will get splatted they want another quarter. So the shill-post algorithms were like that. you can't do or post anything to make them shut up? but if you never tried you never got there. And the fact is that the "drip drip drip turn up the temperature of it, and boil those F'in frogs in their cute little infinity channell , ha ha ha, and let them fry in their own fear" efforts of what were (and will be when 8ch returns sometime early September of Twenty-nineteen, that being the Two Thousenth and Ninteenth year since the day that was with in 70 or so years of the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ. You're suppose to get a good and humourful message from that.

the attack on 8ch was a hit job. And the fact of it being an effective comm link doesn't escape anyone. The territorial urination of control freakish thought-and-mind-agenda-farming mindsqueeze shills was obvious and constant and on-going. There is no way it was not an attack. Anonymous free speech being destroyed was their prize. But at 8ch the posters were never really anonymous, and all the savoy posters knew that full well. It was alike a grapphitti wall. you own your own post. It was like the stuff you read wrriten on a wall in a bathroom, most of it was nonsense but sometimes there might be something meaningful. or like a giant train station waiting area, like 30th STreet station, you can say what you want but sometimes it doesn't gove over well when other people hear you.

At 8ch the good posts would deconstruct the false narratives of the 'mainstream'. The purpose of the shills? To stop that ability of almost instantanious anhilation of the false narrative. There are no free speech zones on the INternet anymore that aren't compped by people who suppress messages that they don't like. That would be 'fine' in some sense if it weren't seeming as if the same people control all the channels. On, forexample, the face-show channels you can see some smoking 20something nerd narciscist naked and nodding and giving a show, and you can pay him so you can watch the whole thing and see it all . . . whatever it is. and be a dupe. but if you want to try and watch a bunch of friendly spiritualists talk about politics and space aliens? If they like trump they are blocked. If they don't like trump they are allowed. (assumptions that are presented as conjecture)

The war for free speach had a major battle at 8ch. And even though it seems as though 8ch was taken out for a time, in the end 8ch was a warzone. And when it was 'taken down' it was done willfully. Lessons learned. Time to take the battleship in to dry dock and do some refitting. It's not going to be the same when it comes back, let's hope. It was a pyrrhic victory for those of the control-freak class, at best, that 8ch is gone, because it's not really gone.

Yes, 8ch is not really gone. It's just on vacation!

explanations that have no words

on another note in media news the AnjelCast (TM) did not occur last evening. Disappointing.

12:44 PM
Aug 25, 2019

This is supposed to be a poetry blog too!

If he spent as much time
studying

The Sermon on 
  the Mount

as he does Q-drops
he might get some where,
he might know something.
he might actually become
(acktuaaalllyy?)
aware and awake
instead of seeming to be
in a constant
waking dream of
narcisscisstic excess
and extreme
dude dank darkness
saying he's one thing
being the other
saying he's the other
being a different other
and generally being
too stoned
and confused
to keep up with the cast
at that time
which is fine
but you think he'd
know to not post it . . . 
when he's obviously drunk
and naked
and scchiit posting
in the early AM
 . . . while doing a pod cast? ? ?
 
 (an angel-cast)

But a dark angel
maybe just isn't in the light?
what do you mean by dark?
surely you don't mean him
he's a lot of fun
even when he's sleep walking
or larping as adventure man
like Butters in a MattandTrey creation.
He's a AmerMexican Butters, all grown up.
and still in the superhero larp 
like in the . . . ? ? ? episode.
you gotta love this dude.

Aug 13 , 2019

Flipper
 when it flips
eventually Flips back to original conditions
Or maybe it goes out in orbit

why waste my time 
falling in love 
with you
like a fool
on a battlement
a Sunday
years after the war
sunny
far away clouds move in the sky
along ridges
of honey
colored blossoms of the distant slopes
Springtime is here and the season elopes
with it self in a joy that we get
when we open our heart and don't have regret

why waste my time
falling in love
with a dream
he eats
he sleeps
he worries
he says crazy shit on the phone
and even when his image is blury
I 'm happy that he's safe at home

and it's a larper

Larper
Larper
Larper phagging On

oh no larper, phag, anon!


He knows how to flip
but can he flip back
or does he go off into orbit?

 
 
 
 AmerMexican Butters, 
  all grown up.   (really?)
and still
      in 
 the superhero larp 
 
 
 
 in other news:
 8ch got deplatformed Aug 5, 2019
 (I was sleeping)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Donald Trump is an
  awesome
 president
 
 Lt. Dan is a
 Social Media Wizard
 
  
 

 
     🚙
  
Onward into the storied evening!  

hover over the logo images for a page modification effect.

  

Love
People!

    
    
🖐morning
clover🖐

these can get you banned from school?!:
🔫 🚀 🚙🚤🚣c🍀⚜⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣🚣
🚣🚣🚣  🚀  🚀🔨🔨🔨⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣
🔨 🚙 🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣
⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣

spinfont unicode-isms
🍀 Praise God! 🍀
🍀⏲⏱⏰⏲⏱🔫⏰⏰⏲⏱🔫⏰⏰🍀
🎠 
🎠 
🎠 
🔫
🔨🔨 
🍀 Praise God! 🍀

🖐
🖐
🖐
🖐
🖐
🖐

Here is today's pretty poem:

  

Poetry
fading with the dusk
into the sounds of
chirps




    

🖐 🌙 🖑
🖑🌛 🌜🖐
   
 🖐🖑

 ♥♥?


 🖐🖑
🖑🖐


glossary of what's next
 ♥♥? : 

Be nice to yourself and others. What other choice?

Wake up!

 
 
 

♥♥ Praise ♥♥ the ♥♥ Lord ♥♥ !!

end of column