Our president works so hard for us!

how come everyone in the parrot pages is smack talking Don and saying he's a . . . . and that the deep purple needs to fall upon?

I do not understand that narrative. We had a civil encounter wtih a worthy and necessary world leader. And people were saying about it being . . . . well they have nasty thing that they put on their sites about our president. Even the news that is usually on his side, the one with the name of the most aloof of canines, were 'oh, no no no you don't you're really gone to far nowwwwww' kind of stance. I have no right reviewing them becuase I really don't watch them any more and it's curious in a certain sense, that people still pay attention to that. Well that's tell you about me, no them.

I don't, don't understand. I know that this world is fraught with mean and with falsity. But what, excatly, did Mr. President do wrong to be called those worse case things? Our president.

Am I blind? Do I not comprehend the big trends of the world? Let me see, we have Ukraine. I have a date in the 1570s. I think it was the 1570s. And the Ukrainians were 'please help' and the relationship between the two groups was cemented into the future. Therer is no turning back. Now Mr. Putin says that he had a pleblicite as per the United Nations charter. I suppose that might be a bone for some, given how comped and cuked the UN has gotten, practically a fully owned subsidiary of . . . but that's the narrative of the right, and is the left using it? of course I'm just throwing fud in the fan.

We get a half story, perhaps, from the shepards smith mindset. Does Shep forget how Ukraine got to where it was that the Crimea had to come into a specila deal with Russia? To say 'please come, like in hte 1570s, and make us as your cousins.' They propabably were all distant cousins at least. But it's a cartel world, and that place has a very strange and long history of being a slaver slave socity. The Russians were and are always on the side of freeing slaves. That is a deep fact of History and anyone who doesn't now that fact isn't getting a good eductaion (what a cheep defense. I demand that you give this at least one more rewrite and take out your offenisve deffense of the integrity of the Russian narrative. And what society ever says that they support abomination. It's rather the stoyr of human freedom going forward. And at war what is the narrative for peace? We need to at least have a conference and discuss it. That is what Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin did. If there is more or less there I don't kjnow but I don't think that a presidnet coducting foreign policy should be called a traitor by the cartel spokesparrots when he's doing a very dangerous job. Again, did he make a mistake yesterday? Can we think that Russia is going to help us going forward? I think yes, knowing the grand and long swath of the beautiful realist strokes (as if this is a grand Russian painter making a masterwork) that Russian will draw on the canvas of History. Freeing the stepes from raiders and slavers, who killed parents and enslaved childrend back in their pallace cities. Like javva the hutt. That's the myth: the freedom of the slaves come when the Rusians show up and then it's made right. So does Russian intellegence try and entrap presidents? and is Trump being blackmailed? That is the narrative that I can sense that some may like to put forward.

I don't have an answer for that. But also I will say that yes, Russia and not allies in the sense that Shep means. But, Shep, are they enemies? Of the people? Of slaves? Of children being trafficked? Whose trying to stop thta? Who profiteers off of it? Some claim to have the answers to those questions and that que of people, lined up to the side of your mainstream of sewage, have their own sewage system of sorts and ti's mostly filled with crap but tyere is from time to time a clue, they call it 'crumpbs.' And the const 'this is a larp, a larp I tell ya.' but you can find news there and things happening in real time and what seems to be an active psycholoctical mindfugging attempt by who that are called 'shills' and a constant discussing about supremicism by people who delude to be supreme or to know who that do, ti's such a narcisscissitc larp the whole time you see that but . . . you see it's like a train station. Anyone can be there. And just because you find crap there doesn't mena that the diamonds aren';t handed out freely when the que leads you to the correct post, that says . . . and you read it and it's real.

Who is it? who knows? somoene knows. Does it matter? Like I say, it's like a public park or a trainstation: an open ideas foruem. So whatever you find could be from any kind of fair or fowl conjecture of ? unknown minds (they call them 'anons'). Most of it is spetci crap in these channels. But there are filters of a sort, and a lot of larping.

bottom line: int he past it did seem that that 'research' thred did also have an element of being . . . .

And it still does from time to time.

Back to the president and his detracktors: what is your plan except 'we don't like this man as president'

Summer time and the living is ?

I have tried to understand what they all think Don did wrong, but I still don't knjow. Except that they just don't like Trump. I like Trump. Maybe I'm blind to his flaws? No. I'm not. I could give a list of them. I just don't see that his combination of shoot form of loose vernacular, and saying what he means not worrying about how other people will (intentinally) misinterpret him. He's a genius of it and knowing what triggers people. I am sure that he and Putin ahve much the same skill set, and they probably do get along on a lot of different intellectual ways. But they are world leaders and I see that in them both so . . . what did Trump do wrong? Brennon is saying 'traitor'. Many say that about Brennon.

Has anyone done a poll: three men, four men: Soros,Brennon, Putin, Trump, which of these do you trust the least?

It's a loaded question. There is no good answer. Do not take this test. For me it's Trump and Putin who I would trust. I would not trust Brennon. And Soros, who would ever trust him?

As far as Brennon and Soros go? I don't think that the stories told about those two in a hundred years are going to be saying anyting about them being heroes. They'll mill that whole part of their couragous narrative, as if they never really were, or even tried to be. Am I unfair to these two men who I don't even know who have had undue influence upoon world affairs based upon . . . It wasn't democratic. Was it fair and honset what got them there?

So we can see what happens now.

Yesterday

I watched the end of the big news conference today. Wow. And as well I'm glad that the two countries are now openly going to be working together on the further anti-corruption efforts. 1.4 billion US$? That number Vladimir stated. And who was it that got that amount, without any taxation on it, Vladimir asked.

So, ya, boom.

Ur won?

Uranium One. That is what Mr. Putin discussed. It is alledged that associates of a former Secretary of State benifited from a sweetheart deal.

So will the Uranium One deal finally blow up in Hillary's face? Will the last administration have to face the facts as they are laid out? Will IGs and such finally unseal the indictments?

Well, thank you to both world leaders for having a meeting. Now our two nations have a better path forward, in cooperation for justice. Mr Mueller can even go to Russia if he wants now, and get closer to the truth. Maybe the question of no tax in the 1.4B$ and the 400M$ big donation can also be answered.

Justice is puzzling at times. But we aren't puzzled when it doesn't happen. We all know. Working together is the best path forward. Thank you to both Donald and Vladimir.

Lurk mour
Post Less