The Left Column

Politics for Poets

What are the odds?

The same candidate was reported to have won 5 of 5 separate coin tosses. Astronomical. She's the luckiest gal in the world. Oh, am I being derisive to call her a 'gal'? What other words that men used to commanly use to refer to women have been basically banned from the dialectic by fussy dilectical imperialism (of stock outrage)?

I get it: you don't use mean words that deride. But 5 of 5 separate coin tosses? What are the odds? If my mind remembers, it would be 2^5. So the odds that the luckiest gal in the world would win 5 tosses of 5? 1 in 32. What a lucky broad, dame, chick, chica, female, woman, wife, enabler?

even the rules the statistics don't seem to apply.

In politics, astronomical odds bring a certains sense of fraud. If you break the tosses into an even spread . . . the results of the cacus results are different as to what it has been made to seem in the media where a 'win' has been declared. Seems more even or dead even, then a 'win'.

As far as words to describe women? When we use the words we use for our own purposes, aren't we usually fully aware of their effect? Often we are not. And if there are bully-girls around, we take the consequences. If we actually do criminal things, or act in an impolite way, then we face consequences for that too. If we use these words in 'social media', we find very little decorum in some sectors of it. And in comment's sections? In very many Internet places, where reasonable posts display skepticism and opposition to group-think conformism, the mirroring effect of spam-bot processes fill the web-pages with a snark fest of racial, ethnic, and partisan hatreds and fueding. Don't believe the hate and you are much better off.

Banning words is a bad idea. Banning hatred? It's impossible. And mean. And unreasonible. As far as words go, in politics, there better be a real reason to get upset if words turn into derision. In the sense of describing a self-important, self-entitled enabler narcisscist, and words that are banned by the liberal thugocracy of controlling manners, that hushing thing that beast-bot people do, when they bresticulate for 'muscle' to 'shut-up' their opposition.

They dig the pit. They put the opposition in it. Or they bully people to go there. And so, when people stand up to the bully, and the mob that the bully has under her/his/? sway, and dares speak sense, and truth, and demand that their rights not be violated, when that happens, the bullies wilt in fear for their tenure.

we are at a cusp where bad choices needed to be diminished. 1 in 32. That's really great to win that bet. But it makes any 'win' a lot less authentic.

As far as if or if not the prosecutors finally get to make her face a judge and jury? What happens to her demonstrats the level of corruption which her-folk use as a bedrock. If it shows her to be beyond prosecution, even for serious breeches, then it shows her not as a person who believes in equality, be it between men and women or women and people who we don't know their gender, or men and those, who we don't now their gender. If equality if really what is going on then the result of her behaviors should bring her to have to make account before judges and with a prosecutorial regime that is just about what they do to any one else who does the same things.

The unfair use of the judicial system is also a form of tyranny. In this case we have audacious political apparatchiks who believe themselves a separate class, with their own set of rules. As citizens we ought to be outraged. And when we are we get that bully-girl thing: how dare you use those words. And it usually is a woman. or a person who we just don't know . . . what they are . . . that becomes this ugly bully, spitting hatful words at us and accusing us of being . . . dare I say it . . . Republicans. As if.

And what happens to her shows us what the view is from the people currently squating in the chairs of power.

I don't think prison would be a good place for a grand mother. But I'm not the one who gets to decide. If it were me I'd make a deal with her: get her to stop it all and step down to allow some other apparatchick to take the mantle of power. The deomcrats need someone to wear their god-head mask, and it ought to be someone who hasn't so eggregiously and obviously violated national security through lax and criminal practices (as it seems from everything we've seen).

And as far as justice goes, it ought not be a coin-toss. That is also a very bad way to choose a candidate.

worry not. The tiniest seed becomes a giant tree.

Believe in the Power Of God!

show of hands for who that
love the police!

🖐Love🖑
🖑Cops🖐

I also made some logos for Amillia Publishing 
company. How about some interesting frames of animation?

What they claim is good
 for 'the environment' 
   really sucks 
  for the forest.

    
    
🖐Love🖑
🖑Cops🖐

Watch This

show of hands for who that
love the police!
🖐Love🖑
🖑Cops🖐

🔫 🚀 🚙🚤🚣c🍀⚜⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣🚣
🚣🚣🚣  🚀  🚀🔨🔨🔨⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣
🔨 🚙 🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣
⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣⏲⏱⏰🚣🚣


even Know-it-all-will-tell-yaa:
When people complaign about the words 
you use often they don't really want to 
hear what you have to say.

spinfont unicode-isms
🍀 Praise God! 🍀
🍀⏲⏱⏰⏲⏱🔫⏰⏰⏲⏱🔫⏰⏰🍀
🎠 
🎠 
🎠 
🔫 
🔨🔨 

Delete and repeat, delete.

will? Maybe I've not ordered the elements properly. Well that little snippit doesn't work that well but t

 
🖐

sub 🖐🖑 🖑🖐

Here is today's pretty poem:

  

sparse shape
and seemingly childlike
simplicity.
War is Over.

Picasso's Eyes

    

🖐🖑
🖑🖐
   
 🖐🖑

🖐🖑 🖑🖐

 ♥♥?



🖐🖑
🖑🖐


glossry of what's next
 ♥♥? : 

Be nice to yourself and others. What other choice?

Wake up!

  Praise God!

♥♥ Praise ♥♥ the ♥♥ Lord ♥♥ because ♥♥ He's ♥♥ Wonderful ♥♥ and ♥♥ Awesome ♥♥!!

end of column